AOT Logo
Member Portal
Visit AOT on Facebook View my LinkedIn Profile Follow AOT on Twitter Subscribe to AOT\'s RSS Feed
  • Home
  • Business Consulting
    • Business Health CheckUp
    • On Target Business Success Program
    • Business Planning
    • Management Retreats
    • Marketing Strategy
    • Client Advisory Boards
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Budgets and Profit Improvement Planning
  • On Target Program
    • On Target Business Intensive
    • On Target Program Options
    • On Target Executive Peer Groups for Contractors
  • Coaching
    • Customized Coaching Options
    • Coaching Skills Training
  • Events
    • Social Media Marketing – From Mystery to Mastery
    • Business Plan – Roadmap to Success Webinar Series
  • Training
    • Phone Right Communications Training
    • Effective Financial Management
    • Towards Awesome Service
    • Coaching Skills for Managers
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Member Portal
Emails for Small Business with Constant Contact

Archive for Employment Law

Politics in the Workplace

By Christopher Olmsted
Thursday, October 30th, 2008

As Election Day approaches, politics inevitably seeps into the workplace. What if employees become disruptive, argumentative, annoying, or just plain unproductive on account of politics in the workplace? Does an employer have the right to limit political activities of employees in the workplace?

The answer is: “It depends.” In the private sector, in some jurisdictions, it is unlawful for employers to prevent employees from engaging in political activities or affiliations. But that does not mean employees are free to engage in any kind political activity on the clock, in the workplace.

In California, for example, Labor Code Section 1101 makes it unlawful for an employer to make, adopt, or enforce any rule, regulation, or policy: (a) Forbidding or preventing employees from engaging or participating in politics or from becoming candidates for public office. (b) Controlling or directing, or tending to control or direct the political activities or affiliations of employees.  Labor Code Section 1102 makes it unlawful to coerce or influence or attempt to coerce or influence his employees through or by means of threat of discharge or loss of employment to adopt or follow or refrain from adopting or following any particular course or line of political action or political activity. Read More→

Categories : Employment Law
Tags : Employment Law, Politics

New EEOC Publication Addresses Thorny ADA Issues

By Christopher Olmsted
Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

What happens when an employee with a mental disability misbehaves in the workplace? If the mental disability causes the employee to misbehave and violate workplace conduct rules, can the employer discipline the employee?

The EEOC has tackled this thorny ADA question, and many others, in a new publication titled: ”The Americans With Disabilities Act: Applying Performance And Conduct Standards To Employees With Disabilities.”

An EEOC press release acknowledges that employers struggle greatly with the ADA’s vague proscriptions and mandates. “The EEOC continues to receive numerous questions on these topics from employers and from individuals with disabilities, indicating that there is still a high level of uncertainty about how the ADA affects these fundamental personnel issues. This document will serve a critical need and enhance compliance with the ADA.” The press release can be found here

According to the new guide, the ADA permits employers to apply the same performance standards to all employees, including those with disabilities, and emphasizes that the ADA does not affect an employer’s right to hold all employees to basic conduct standards, notes the press release. “At the same time,” cautions the EEOC, “employers must make reasonable accommodations that enable individuals with disabilities to meet performance and conduct standards.”

For example, the EEOC provides the following hypothetical example: Read More→

Categories : Employment Law
Tags : ADA, EEOC, Employment Law

The IRS Increases Mileage Rates Due to Gas Prices

By Christopher Olmsted
Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

On June 23rd the Internal Revenue Service announced an increase in the standard mileage rates for the final six months of 2008.

The rate will increase to 58.5 cents a mile for all business miles driven from July 1, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2008. This is an increase of eight (8) cents from the 50.5 cent rate in effect for the first six months of 2008.

The IRS announced the unusual mid-year increase in recognition of recent gasoline price increases. The IRS normally updates the mileage rates once a year in the fall for the next calendar year.

“Rising gas prices are having a major impact on individual Americans. Given the increase in prices, the IRS is adjusting the standard mileage rates to better reflect the real cost of operating an automobile,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “We want the reimbursement rate to be fair to taxpayers.”

While gasoline is a significant factor in the mileage figure, other items enter into the calculation of mileage rates, such as depreciation and insurance and other fixed and variable costs.

The optional business standard mileage rate is used to compute the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business use in lieu of tracking actual costs. This rate is also used as a benchmark by the federal government and many businesses to reimburse their employees for mileage.

To view the IRS announcement: Click Here

Employers should consider increasing the reimbursement rates to match the new IRS rate. Generally, employers must reimburse employees for travel expenses incurred in the course of work. For example, in California, Labor Code section 2802, subdivision (a), requires an employer to indemnify its employees for expenses they necessarily incur in the discharge of their duties. Note that in California, paying the IRS rate does not guarantee that the employer has fully reimbursed the employee for actual travel expenses. The California Supreme Court recently addressed employee travel expense reimbursement in a case titled Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shopper, Inc.

The article presented herein is intended as a brief overview of the law and is not intended to substitute as legal advice. Any questions or concerns regarding any statute or case law should be addressed to a licensed attorney.

Categories : Employment Law
Tags : Economy, Employee Expenses

Wage & Hour Update: Pro-Ration of Minimum Salary For Part-Time Exempt Employees Disallowed

By Christopher Olmsted
Monday, June 30th, 2008

The U.S. Department of Labor recently issued an opinion letter on the topic of pro-rated salaries for exempt employees.

An employer inquired whether it is an acceptable practice to pro-rate the minimum allowable salary of an exempt employee to reflect his 20 hour per week part-time status, by paying the worker $15,000. In a letter dated February 14, 2008, the DOL responded that salary pro-ration is not allowed.

The rule applies to all exempt classifications subject to the salary test. The most common exempt classifications are executive, administrative, and professional. Properly classified exempt employees are not entitled to overtime and are exempt from various other wage and hour rules. To qualify, exempt workers must be paid a minimum salary set by law, and also perform certain defined duties.

Under federal law, exempt employees must be paid a minimum salary of $23,660 annually, or $455 per week. This minimum amount must be paid even if the employee works part time. An employer wishing to pay an employee less than the minimum would have to classify the worker as a regular hourly non-exempt employee.

The minimum may be higher in some states. For example, in California the minimum salary is higher: $33,280 or $640 per week. As under federal law, payment below the statutory minimum would cause the employee to lose exempt status.

Employers are reminded that paying the minimum salary does not necessarily qualify employees for exempt status. Under both state and federal law, the employee must also meet a “duties test” that focuses on the job duties of the employee.

For more details, here’s the link to the DOL opinion letter.

The article presented herein is intended as a brief overview of the law and is not intended to substitute as legal advice. Any questions or concerns regarding any statute or case law should be addressed to a licensed attorney.

Categories : Employment Law
Tags : Christopher Olmsted, Employment Law, Human Resources
Sign Up for our Monthly Newsletter

Email:

Follow AdvisorOnTarget on Twitter
View Linnea Blair's profile on LinkedIn

Recent Posts

  • Clear Your Desk to Start Fresh
  • The Art of Hiring Smart – 8 Steps to a First Class Hiring Process
  • How Do You Look On The Small Screen?
  • Going Paperless (or nearly paperless)
  • Do you know where your target market is?

Categories

  • 6 Advisors
  • Business Operations
  • Business Planning
  • Business Strategy
  • Construction Law
  • Customer Service Systems
  • Employees
  • Employment Law
  • Events
  • Financial Management
  • Human Resources
  • Internet Marketing
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Member Notices
  • On Target Program
  • Personal Growth
  • Productivity
  • Productivity Tips
  • QuickBooks Tips
  • Relationship Marketing
  • Sales
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Tips for Entrepreneurs
  • Uncategorized
  • What's Next?

Archives

  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005

Tags

6 Advisors Accounts Receivables ADA Advisors On Target Best Business Practices Borrowing Brand Business Law Business Mistakes Business Operations Business Plan Business Planning Business Strategy Business Valuation Cash Flow Cash Management Customer Loyalty Customer Service Economy Email Marketing Employee Development Employees Employment Law Finance Financial Management Human Resources Internet Marketing IT Leadership Marketing Niche Market On Target Program painting contractors Personal Growth Productivity Productivity Tips Project Management QuickBooks Tips Relationship Marketing SEO Small Business Coaching Small Business Consulting Social Media Team Technology
NetworkedBlogs
Blog:
Advisors On Target Business Success Blog
Topics:
business strategy, marketing, internet marketing
 
Follow my blog

Copyright © 2003-2010
Advisors On Target LLC   |   3940 Hortensia Street, #201   |   San Diego, CA 92110  |  619-291-3700

Contact Us
Privacy Policy